When what ‘was’ is . . .

. . . may be skewed by what one’s definition of “is” was.

Instapundit has a round-up of reactions rebutting claims made by former President Clinton on yesterday’s ‘Fox News Sunday’ that at the time, Republicans did not back him in his military actions against Iraq, but instead widely and roundly accused him of “tail wagging the dog” tricks to draw attention away from the Lewinsky scandal.

UPDATE: Opinion Journal strikes back at Bill by reprinting this WSJ editorial from August 21, 1998.

-30- Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: